Multiple return value as requirements for safety and performance

[Ilya Yaroshenko via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 20 December 2016 at 17:28:49 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
> On Tuesday, 20 December 2016 at 17:15:53 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko 
> wrote:
>>
>> Are they already CTFEable? I have not seen an anounce, sorry
>
> They have been for years now.
> Of course only pointers from a CTFE context are valid at ctfe.
>
> The new engine will support them as well, (as it will 
> eventually support everything with the exception of 80bit reals)

Thanks!
Sorry for the noise!