DIP10005: Dependency-Carrying Declarations is now available for community feedback

[Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d]

On 19.12.2016 06:31, deadalnix wrote:
> On Sunday, 18 December 2016 at 23:18:27 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> Great, thanks. Please take a look at the accuracy of the discussion. I
>> expanded the "Workaround" section and moved it near the top.
>>
>> https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/pull/51
>>
>> https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/dd46252e820dce66df746540d7ab94e0b00a6505/DIPs/DIP1005.md
>>
>>
>>
>> Andrei
>
> What's wrong with the parentheseless version ? The DIP says it looks
> "out of place" but that doesn't strike me as a very good argument. IMO
> the version without ";" is the way to go, as it doesn't require to add a
> new syntax for imports.
>
> Identical things looking identical is valuable.
>

+1.