D future ...

[thedeemon via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 21 December 2016 at 11:54:35 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko 
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 21 December 2016 at 11:36:14 UTC, thedeemon wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 20 December 2016 at 10:18:12 UTC, Kelly Sommers 
>> wrote:
>>> [...]
>>
>> Bad news: without complete redesign of the language and 
>> turning into one more C++/CLI (where you have different kinds 
>> of pointers in the language for GC and non-GC), having C 
>> performance and Go-style low-pause GC is not really possible. 
>> You have to choose one. Go chose GC with short pauses but paid 
>> with slow speed overall and slow C interop. D chose C-level 
>> performance but paid for it with a slow GC.
>
> If this is true, a blog post about it with more details is very 
> welcome --Ilya

Have you seen this one?
http://www.infognition.com/blog/2014/the_real_problem_with_gc_in_d.html