Red Hat's issues in considering the D language

Wed Dec 21 08:30:15 PST 2016

On Wednesday, 21 December 2016 at 10:15:26 UTC, hardreset wrote:
> On Tuesday, 20 December 2016 at 23:08:28 UTC, Andrei 
> Alexandrescu wrote:
>> Hello, a few engineers at Red Hat are taking a look at using 
>> the D language on the desktop and have reached out to us. They 
>> have created a list of issues. We are on the top-level ones, 
>> and of course would appreciate any community help as well.
>
> Is moving to LLVM backend or LDC something that is on the 
> roadmap?

What does it mean to "move" to LDC? Why can't you use LDC now?