Red Hat's issues in considering the D language

[hardreset via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 21 December 2016 at 16:30:15 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
> On Wednesday, 21 December 2016 at 10:15:26 UTC, hardreset wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 20 December 2016 at 23:08:28 UTC, Andrei 
>> Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> Hello, a few engineers at Red Hat are taking a look at using 
>>> the D language on the desktop and have reached out to us. 
>>> They have created a list of issues. We are on the top-level 
>>> ones, and of course would appreciate any community help as 
>>> well.
>>
>> Is moving to LLVM backend or LDC something that is on the 
>> roadmap?
>
> What does it mean to "move" to LDC? Why can't you use LDC now?

Moving the reference compiler to LLVM as was suggested in the 
list.