Improvement in pure functions specification

Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Fri Dec 23 11:32:22 PST 2016


On 12/23/2016 01:53 PM, Johan Engelen wrote:
> Perhaps I read this wrong but: the paragraph says that non-strongly-pure
> functions receive no special treatment, but then the next paragraph adds
> special treatment for a subset of non-strongly-pure functions... :)

Fixed. Keep destruction coming. -- Andrei


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list