DIP10005: Dependency-Carrying Declarations is now available for community feedback

[Joakim via Digitalmars-d]

On Saturday, 24 December 2016 at 17:53:04 UTC, Chris Wright wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 09:20:19 +0000, John Colvin wrote:
>> There are a lot of templates in Phobos that never use the 
>> template keyword. The proposal doesn't only apply to 
>> constraints, it applies to the whole declaration.
>
> If you have a better way of estimating the impact, I'd love to 
> see it.

Can we hold off on the performance discussion?  Walter says this 
DIP isn't hard to implement 
(https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/pull/51#issuecomment-269077790), 
so we will run some numbers and see what we get.  As you know, I 
too am skeptical of the benefit but Andrei has shown that import 
fanout has a non-negligible cost with his latest benchmark, and 
actual measurement will be the best way to decide.