D future ...

[YAHB via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 28 December 2016 at 11:36:33 UTC, Satoshi wrote:
> On Wednesday, 28 December 2016 at 11:18:10 UTC, YAHB wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 28 December 2016 at 10:52:45 UTC, Satoshi wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 28 December 2016 at 10:52:45 UTC, Satoshi wrote:
>>> Making header files manually is a wast of time what i don't 
>>> have.
>>
>> Write your own header generator.
> Yes, why not to write my own language.

Pfff...too hard to use an AST visitor. And that wants to release 
a commercial IDE.

>
>> Personally I don't get the point of writing an IDE if at a 
>> time or another you don't start working a bit around you 
>> know...D syntax, D grammar.
> Actually, I written an OS in D.

True...an Outrageous Scam...

>
>> Instead you seem to get stuck on first issue related to the 
>> language.
> First issue? Developers of LDC can respond and fix issue in a 
> real time but developers of D frontend not. And that's the 
> thing what pissed me off.
>
>> But what's the real issue ? You want to release a pre-compiled 
>> static library with headers ?
> Yes.
>
>> Then you could license the sources, simply.
> No, thanks.

Just think to your strategy and try to be wise. Even Qt sources 
are available. There's at least 10 ways to waste a freelance 
commercial project.

>
>> Personally I've been client of a commercial GUI framework, and 
>> we get the sources with the license. It worked, I mean that 
>> the developer had clients.