D future ...

[Satoshi via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 28 December 2016 at 12:03:53 UTC, YAHB wrote:
>>>> Making header files manually is a wast of time what i don't 
>>>> have.
>>>
>>> Write your own header generator.
>> Yes, why not to write my own language.
>
> Pfff...too hard to use an AST visitor. And that wants to 
> release a commercial IDE.
Compiler design is not my business.

>>> Personally I don't get the point of writing an IDE if at a 
>>> time or another you don't start working a bit around you 
>>> know...D syntax, D grammar.
>> Actually, I written an OS in D.
>
> True...an Outrageous Scam...
So funny...
https://github.com/Rikarin/Trinix

>>> Instead you seem to get stuck on first issue related to the 
>>> language.
>> First issue? Developers of LDC can respond and fix issue in a 
>> real time but developers of D frontend not. And that's the 
>> thing what pissed me off.
>>
>>> But what's the real issue ? You want to release a 
>>> pre-compiled static library with headers ?
>> Yes.
>>
>>> Then you could license the sources, simply.
>> No, thanks.
>
> Just think to your strategy and try to be wise. Even Qt sources 
> are available. There's at least 10 ways to waste a freelance 
> commercial project.
Qt is out of dated crap mostly useless for fast GUI development. 
Anyway, it's my project and I don't want to release source codes. 
No, it's not a freelance project, I got some money for dev and I 
already have clients waiting for stable release. There will be 
info soon.

>>> Personally I've been client of a commercial GUI framework, 
>>> and we get the sources with the license. It worked, I mean 
>>> that the developer had clients.
I don't need to follow same rules as others do.