DIP10005: Dependency-Carrying Declarations is now available for community feedback

deadalnix via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Wed Dec 28 07:48:46 PST 2016


On Saturday, 24 December 2016 at 15:44:18 UTC, Andrei 
Alexandrescu wrote:
>> A compiler enhancement can do this _without_ a language change.
>
> The language addition has additional benefits as described by 
> DIP1005. -- Andrei

Yes, question is, are these specific benefits worth adding a 
language change ?

Right now you got :

A/ No language change, get X.
B/ Language change, get X and Y.

It stand to reason that B should be evaluated on the benefit 
provided by Y, and Y only, rather than X and Y, as X can be 
provided without the language change.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list