DIP10005: Dependency-Carrying Declarations is now available for community feedback
deadalnix via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Wed Dec 28 07:48:46 PST 2016
On Saturday, 24 December 2016 at 15:44:18 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
>> A compiler enhancement can do this _without_ a language change.
>
> The language addition has additional benefits as described by
> DIP1005. -- Andrei
Yes, question is, are these specific benefits worth adding a
language change ?
Right now you got :
A/ No language change, get X.
B/ Language change, get X and Y.
It stand to reason that B should be evaluated on the benefit
provided by Y, and Y only, rather than X and Y, as X can be
provided without the language change.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list