TIOBE February 2016.... 15 ?!

Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Wed Feb 3 00:53:27 PST 2016


On Wednesday, 3 February 2016 at 08:43:39 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
> And how do you verify that that's a better classification? If 
> you look at the graphs of any of "D", "dlang", "D programming 
> language", "D language", "D programming", none of them seems to 
> correlate with events such as the date of first publication, 
> version 1.000, version 2.000, the conferences etc.

You have to make a qualitative judgement. Terms such as "dlang" 
has only been in used in recent years and probably only by 
invested users. It is difficult to find terms for "D" that have 
enough volume to show up. "d programming language" is probably 
only used by non-users, it shows a clear spike in october 2004, 
july 2005, january 2007, july 2014, but a general falling trend. 
While "dlang" is more stable.




More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list