An important pull request: accessing shared affix for immutable data

[Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d]

On 2/12/16 10:10 PM, tsbockman wrote:
> Cool. Then this technique could also be used to address Timon Gehr's
> concerns about violating the type system, if necessary.

Regarding that. Not sure what he meant, but it dawned on me we've never 
mentioned in the language spec that using synchronization unnecessarily 
for non-shared data and also using no synchronization (in the same 
thread) is fine. -- Andrei