An important pull request: accessing shared affix for immutable data

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d]

On Saturday, 13 February 2016 at 13:10:19 UTC, Andrei 
Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 2/13/16 7:40 AM, John Colvin wrote:
>> On Saturday, 13 February 2016 at 00:30:58 UTC, Andrei 
>> Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> On 02/12/2016 06:52 PM, deadalnix wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>
>>> I think we're good there. -- Andrei
>>
>> Is there somewhere where I / others can see an explanation of 
>> how "we're
>> good"? Those sound like genuine problems.
>
> Those are just a soup of generic considerations that could be 
> brought about any code. -- andrei

Indeed, I just explained why some major moved away from it, it is 
not like it is relevant. I mean, it is not like this is proposed 
as a way to handle memory management in the language down the 
road.