C++ UFCS update

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d]

On 2/13/2016 2:27 AM, Daniel N wrote:
> "Abstract
> This is the proposed wording for a unified call syntax based on the idea that
> f(x,y) can invoke a member function, x.f(y), if there are no f(x,y). The inverse
> transformation, from x.f(y) to f(x,y) is not proposed."
>
> They were considering 6 alternatives and chose the worst...
> https://isocpp.org/files/papers/P0251R0.pdf

Wasn't it us who chose the term UFCS?