C++ UFCS update

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 15 February 2016 at 06:12:30 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 2/13/2016 2:27 AM, Daniel N wrote:
>> "Abstract
>> This is the proposed wording for a unified call syntax based 
>> on the idea that
>> f(x,y) can invoke a member function, x.f(y), if there are no 
>> f(x,y). The inverse
>> transformation, from x.f(y) to f(x,y) is not proposed."
>>
>> They were considering 6 alternatives and chose the worst...
>> https://isocpp.org/files/papers/P0251R0.pdf
>
> Wasn't it us who chose the term UFCS?

These aren't the acronyms you are looking for.