OT: Nature on the 'end' of Moore's Law

Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Wed Feb 17 09:57:11 PST 2016


On Wednesday, 17 February 2016 at 17:10:37 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
> On Tuesday, 16 February 2016 at 18:28:19 UTC, Laeeth Isharc 
> wrote:
>> A pity given data sets keep getting bigger.
>
> Can't it be parallelized on server, and client will only 
> receive presentable data? Then your only concern will be energy 
> consumption.

Yes, it looks like server/HPC increasingly is becoming a separate 
CPU market again.
I read somewhere that next gen high end APU from AMD might have a 
TDP of 200/300W (pretty hot) and basically integrate a full-blown 
GPU and use HBM memory (>128GB/s?).

Intel is going from 14nm to 10nm in 2017. IBM has succeeded with 
7nm silicon-germanium and it is projected for 2018?

So yes, sure, density is reaching a limit, but that does not mean 
that you won't get more effective CPUs, larger dies, stacked 
layers, higher yields (cheaper chips), more cpus per server, 
integrated cooling solutions, cheaper FPGAs, faster memory etc...




More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list