Head Const

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d]

On 2/17/2016 2:38 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 02/17/2016 04:07 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
>> On 2/17/2016 3:56 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> On 02/16/2016 09:53 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
>>>> Most of what people find frustrating about D's transitive
>>>> const/immutable is its very nature of not being sloppy and full of
>>>> holes.
>>>
>>> I thought it was the constructors and postblit that are the matter.
>>> (It may seem
>>> I'm on a snarky streak, but I do think that's the remaining issue with
>>> immutable). -- Andrei
>>
>> Logical const!
>
> How do you mean that? I see no connection. -- Andrei

People want to relax transitive immutability so they can implement logical const.