Head Const

[Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d]

On 18.02.2016 08:51, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 2/17/2016 4:41 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>> Yes, but that really isn't going to help much code. It would be
>> useless for
>> ref-counting const objects, it wouldn't allow you to put a mutex in a
>> const
>> object, and you couldn't do anything with caching calculated
>> properties in a
>> const object.
>
> Embed a headconst pointer to the thing you want to mutate.
>

const(headconst(T)) is the same as const(T), no?