Head Const

Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu Feb 18 04:52:10 PST 2016


On Thursday, 18 February 2016 at 11:20:53 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> Consider "static if is fundamentally flawed" vs "static if is 
> fundamentally flawed [when applied to existing idiomatic C++ 
> code]". Former is opinionated prejudice. Latter can quite 
> easily be true (even if I personally wouldn't agree with it).

It isn't fundamentally flawed, but it is much weaker than a 
constraint-solver.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list