Yet another leak in the sinking ship of @safe
Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu Feb 18 10:58:24 PST 2016
On 2/18/16 11:37 AM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> While @safe is a good idea in principle, the current implementation is
> rather lackluster.
IMO, I think safe code should disallow casting that doesn't involve a
runtime function that verifies safety (such as casting an object to
another type, or invoking a @safe opCast), including casting array types.
And implicit casts to void[] should be disallowed.
This would be a painful restriction, which is why I think it won't happen :(
-Steve
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list