C++ UFCS update

[Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 21 February 2016 at 00:52:13 UTC, bitwise wrote:
> Am I crazy, or is this paper proposing the exact opposite of 
> what would be needed to do chaning of ranges or extension 
> methods?

That is a good thing.

> I don't get how it would be useful at all to type f(x, y) and 
> have the compiler call x.f(y) for me. Why would I ever not want 
> to just use member invocation syntax?

Generic code cannot assume they exist. E.g. cbegin(x)