C++ UFCS update

[Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 24 February 2016 at 21:12:23 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
> It's obvious that Walter considers arity to be part of the 
> identity of an operator. If you find pleasure in finding irony 
> in misrepresented statements, feel free. I don't.

There's nothing misrepresented in what I wrote. If you want arity 
to be part of the identity, you might as well including typing. 
That just a very convenient rewriting of reality, typical 
apologetic D-advocacy. The operator is the symbol and reusing it 
for something unrelated has a negative effect on usability.

You guys need to stop complaining about the insignificant 
splinters of C++ and start worrying about the beams that are 
stumbling blocks for D. C++ is alive and kicking...