Official compiler

[Radu via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 25 February 2016 at 03:05:21 UTC, Walter Bright 
wrote:
> On 2/18/2016 9:52 AM, Kai Nacke wrote:
>> I really like the compiler diversity.
>
> Me too. Having 3 major implementations is a great source of 
> strength for D.

This needs to go further, currently there is no up to date, high 
performance, cross architecture compiler.

The way I see it is to integrate one of the compilers, best 
candidate is LDC, in  the release cycle.

I know that LDC is really close to get to 2.70 level, if mainline 
will only be for regressions and bug fixes for a while, there is 
a good chance LDC could catch up and be part of the daily 
merge-auto-tester loop. This will lower the pressure to 
constantly merge from LDC and allow to focus on other parts of 
the LDC compiler.

Can this be attainable?