Pseudo-random numbers in [0, n), covering all numbers in n steps?

[H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d]

On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 09:26:54PM +0000, Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Friday, 26 February 2016 at 12:21:11 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> >On 02/26/2016 03:05 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> >>I can probably find the PRs if you want to see the context.
> >
> >I understand the motivation behind that statement, and am not worried
> >about pointing fingers etc. Would be great if a new PR removed the
> >text.  -- Andrei
> 
> Done. :-)

Merged. :-)


T

-- 
Let's call it an accidental feature. -- Larry Wall