Why is mangling different for separate compilation?

[Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d]

On Saturday, 27 February 2016 at 11:31:53 UTC, Joakim wrote:
> On Saturday, 27 February 2016 at 11:27:39 UTC, Walter Bright 
> wrote:
>> On 2/27/2016 1:12 AM, Atila Neves wrote:
>>> I've had similar problems in the past with template mixins. 
>>> It seems D's
>>> compile-time features don't mix with any kind of separate 
>>> compilation, which is
>>> a shame.
>>
>> Any ideas on how unit tests should be named?
>
> Why has the additional count been added?  You're already using 
> the line number to differentiate unit test blocks.  For unit 
> test blocks that are all on one line? ;)

I guess that makes sense. And it'd link!

Atila