vibe.d benchmarks

[Daniel Kozak via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 31 December 2015 at 18:23:17 UTC, Etienne Cimon 
wrote:
> On Thursday, 31 December 2015 at 13:29:49 UTC, Daniel Kozak 
> wrote:
>> On Thursday, 31 December 2015 at 12:09:30 UTC, Etienne Cimon 
>> wrote:
>>> [...]
>>
>> When I use HTTPServerOption.distribute with libevent I get 
>> better performance but with libasync it drops from 20000 req/s 
>> to 80 req/s. So maybe some another performance problem
>
> I launch libasync programs as multiple processes, a bit like 
> postgresql. The TCP listening is done with REUSEADDR, so the 
> kernel can distribute it and it scales linearly without any 
> fear of contention on the GC. My globals go in redis or 
> databases

?