vibe.d benchmarks

[Nick B via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 31 December 2015 at 12:44:37 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
> V Thu, 31 Dec 2015 12:26:12 +0000
> yawniek via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> napsáno:
>

>> 
>> obvious typo and thanks for investigating etienne.
>> 
>> @daniel: i made similar results over the network.
>> i want to redo them with a more optimized setup though. my wrk
>> server was too weak.
>> 
>> the local results are still relevant as its a common setup to 
>> have nginx distribute to a few vibe instances locally.
>
> One thing I forgot to mention I have to modify few things
>
> vibe.d has (probably) bug it use threadPerCPU instead of 
> corePerCPU in setupWorkerThreads, here is a commit which make 
> possible to setup it by hand.
>
> https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/vibe.d/commit/f946c3a840eab4ef5f7b98906a6eb143509e1447
>
> (I just modify vibe.d code to use all my 4 cores and it helps a 
> lot)

can someone tell me what changes need to be commited, so that we 
have a chance at getting some decent (or even average) benchmark 
numbers ?