extern(C++, ns)

Manu via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Mon Jan 11 20:02:44 PST 2016


On 12 January 2016 at 08:03, Daniel N via Digitalmars-d
<digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:
>
> 3) Reflection annoyance.

Oh god, I didn't think of that! But I'll definitely run into it soon
enough. How annoying >_<
Existing reflection systems will fail in this case, which would have
otherwise worked just fine without modification.


> Well, at least with my private-symbol workaround I can diminish the issue.

Surely the fact that people are implementing machinery to undo the
damage done is a strong indication that they don't want the feature.
Please, can anyone produce an argument in favour...? Otherwise just
accept that it was a bad idea and eject it into space.
Why could anyone be attached to it?


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list