Anyone using DMD to build 32bit on OS X?

Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Jan 12 15:59:45 PST 2016


On 1/12/2016 2:20 PM, bitwise wrote:
> On Tuesday, 12 January 2016 at 21:28:43 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>> On 1/12/2016 12:36 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> On 01/12/2016 03:30 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>>>> On 2016-01-12 17:48, Walter Bright wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>  From reading the responses here, I believe the best solution is to
>>>>> continue to support OSX 32 bit, but as legacy support. This means
>>>>> folding in changes to the 64 bit support, but not adding features if
>>>>> they are not a natural consequence of the 64 bit support.
>>>>>
>>>>> I.e. leave the TLS support for 32 bits as is.
>>>>
>>>> I came to the same conclusions. I'll update the PR.
>>>
>>> Thanks much for this work! -- Andrei
>>>
>>
>> I agree! Going to native TLS is the right way forward for 64 bits.
>
> Would having shared libraries for 64bit only be ok too?

If they're not already there for 32 bit, then yes.

>
> I would like to avoid having to update the emulated TLS if possible.
>
> Thanks,
>      Bit
>



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list