"Good PR" mechanical check

[H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d]

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 08:47:19AM -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 1/13/16 12:19 AM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> >On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 02:03:57PM -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> >>On 01/12/2016 08:42 AM, Martin Drašar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> >>>Wouldn't it be sufficient to mandate usage of dfmt with proper
> >>>settings before submitting a PR?
> >>
> >>That would suffice at least in the beginning. We also need to put
> >>dfmt in tools, again a project that's been in limbo for a long time.
> >>-- Andrei
> >
> >In principle, I agree with mechanical checking of formatting (instead
> >of the endless tedious nitpicking over the fine points of Phobos
> >style), but, as Jonathan has brought up before, there are cases where
> >human judgment is required and a tool would probably make a big mess
> >of things.
> 
> BTW I recall it was your code containing a "switch(x){" that prompted
> this idea :o). True story. -- Andrei

Haha, was it?  I don't recall anymore. :-P


T

-- 
Не дорог подарок, дорога любовь.