DIP86: Consistency for the "deprecated" attribute/storage class

Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat Jan 16 23:26:12 PST 2016

Previous message: DIP86: Consistency for the "deprecated" attribute/storage class
Next message: Struct initialization using member syntax without variable
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thursday, 14 January 2016 at 02:31:38 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
> http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP86
>
> Your thoughts?

Makes sense to me. The current behavior seems needlessly 
inconsistent.

- Jonathan M Davis

Previous message: DIP86: Consistency for the "deprecated" attribute/storage class
Next message: Struct initialization using member syntax without variable
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list