rval->ref const(T), implicit conversions

[tsbockman via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 19 January 2016 at 18:03:05 UTC, bitwise wrote:
> I'm not here to analyze the finer points of you wrapper thingy
> that no one will ever use.

It's not a "finer point". This isn't really even about my wrapper 
at this point.

Why should anyone listen to your demands for changes to the 
language, when you don't even understand how the relevant 
features work now?