rval->ref const(T), implicit conversions

[bitwise via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 19 January 2016 at 18:18:30 UTC, tsbockman wrote:
> On Tuesday, 19 January 2016 at 18:03:05 UTC, bitwise wrote:
>> I'm not here to analyze the finer points of you wrapper thingy
>> that no one will ever use.
>
> It's not a "finer point". This isn't really even about my 
> wrapper at this point.
>
> Why should anyone listen to your demands for changes to the 
> language, when you don't even understand how the relevant 
> features work now?

It's not that I don't understand, I just don't care to convince 
YOU that I do.

     Bit