DIP 88: Simple form of named parameters

[Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d]

On 2016-01-24 11:14, default0 wrote:

> As for this DIP I don't know - it seems to be well-thought-out, albeit
> with a focus on ease of implementation rather than usefulness for a
> language user, so I don't really have a conclusive opinion on that.

It's focused on having a realistic chance of being accepted.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg