Dconf 2015 talks...

[Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 20:26:12 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
>  What about an alternative allocator? Specifically I'm thinking 
> in C's equivalent which is alloca (allocates directly on the 
> stack with the rest of the variables). If the constructor is a 
> function then that won't work; but if it's inlined then it 
> should work.

I have been wondering about how allocators could help to deal 
with these problems.  Could you put forward a minimal example of 
how you would see it working?

>  I suppose the alternate is an option to skip/throw away some 
> numbers that should've been consumed (assuming you want to keep 
> using the same seed), or seeding each per use.

I'm not sure I follow what you mean here or why you think this 
would work?  Could you give a concrete example?