C++17

[Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 21:01:53 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
> out all but the very best matches. Now there are improvements 
> with C++11, C++14, and C++17, so *that group* getting a *much 
> improved language* has no incentive to switch. Everyone else is 
> already using another language.

Even if that was true, it still means that there are THOUSANDS of 
ex-C++ programmers that would use a C++ like language if it 
provided comparable semantics.

In my experience C++14 is mostly ok if you avoid advanced 
programming mechanisms, but if you want to achieve a specific set 
of abstractions you end up wasting a lot time on getting around 
the corner cases, like avoiding situations where the compiler 
cannot deduce what to do (instantiation conflicts).