C++17

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 27 January 2016 at 09:00:17 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
> The response from the D community seems to be an overwhelming 
> "It's fine as is" when it's obviously not. Which is making me 
> question sinking more time into D if there actually is no 
> cohesive plan to make D an actual C++ competitor rather than a 
> toy language as it currently stands.

I can't take any of this seriously as long as ConcernedDev1950 do 
not provide any PR.