reduce -> fold?
Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Fri Jan 29 04:08:01 PST 2016
As has been discussed before there's been discussion about
std.algorithm.reduce taking the "wrong" order of arguments (its
definition predates UFCS). I recall the conclusion was there'd be subtle
ambiguities if we worked reduce to implement both orders.
So the next best solution is to introduce a new name such as the popular
"fold", and put them together in the documentation.
Thoughts?
Andrei
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list