reduce -> fold?

[Adrian Matoga via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 29 January 2016 at 12:08:01 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
> As has been discussed before there's been discussion about 
> std.algorithm.reduce taking the "wrong" order of arguments (its 
> definition predates UFCS). I recall the conclusion was there'd 
> be subtle ambiguities if we worked reduce to implement both 
> orders.
>
> So the next best solution is to introduce a new name such as 
> the popular "fold", and put them together in the documentation.
>
>
> Thoughts?

YES!

There was a topic on this [1] and some implementation proposed. 
I'm not sure if it was the only one.

[1] 
http://forum.dlang.org/post/sqbizjwcyavbrxwagnwl@forum.dlang.org