integral to floating point conversion

[Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 3 July 2016 at 09:52:38 UTC, Guillaume Boucher wrote:
> This is the correct answer for another definition of "precisely 
> convertible", not the one Andrei gave.

True, I see now that he actually asked for unique representation, 
not precisely convertible.