Vision for the D language - stabilizing complexity?

deadalnix via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Mon Jul 11 19:23:22 PDT 2016


On Tuesday, 12 July 2016 at 01:28:31 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> I don't see anything actionable in your comment.

Defining by which way @safe actually ensure safety would be a 
good start.

I'm sorry for the frustration, but the "mention a problem, get 
asked for an example, provide example, example is debated to 
death while problem is ignored" cycle have become the typical 
interraction pattern around here and that is VERY frustrating.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list