Evaluation order of "+="

[Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d]

On 12 July 2016 at 01:04, Johan Engelen via Digitalmars-d
<digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:
> LDC recently changed the evaluation order of "+=" (I think unintentionally,
> some other eval order problems were fixed). Now, it is different from DMD.
> I am going to argue that I think DMD's order is more useful in the context
> of fibers, and would like your opinion.
>

When I said stabilize references, I meant references, not *all* side
effects. :-)

Assuming that the last conversations I had with kinke are related to this.