Vision for the D language - stabilizing complexity?

[Kagamin via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 14 July 2016 at 20:12:13 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad 
wrote:
> And please note that this horrible excuse is propagate in the 
> C++ community too. Time and time again people claim that C++ is 
> complex, but it has to be like that in order to provide the 
> features it provides.
>
> Not true for C++.
>
> Not true for D.

Your suggestion for static analysis goes the same way: static 
analysis is way more complex than D currently is, but you suggest 
it must be this complex?