Vision for the D language - stabilizing complexity?

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d]

On 7/15/2016 1:58 PM, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
>> I think your argument there is completely destroyed :-)
> I do not understand the joy both you and Andrei express when you think you have
> "won" an "argument". This gives me the feeling that I'm not part of a process
> designed to make the language better, but rather part of an argument meant to
> prove to me that the language is fine the way it is. Not a great feeling, and
> not something that fosters confidence in the language's future direction.

It's just a gentle ribbing, as evidenced by the :-) Please don't read more into 
it than that, as none is intended.