Vision for the D language - stabilizing complexity?

[Andrew Godfrey via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 17 July 2016 at 02:07:19 UTC, pineapple wrote:
> On Sunday, 17 July 2016 at 02:03:52 UTC, Andrew Godfrey wrote:
>> 2) I wonder if an "uninitialized" feature would be worthwhile. 
>> That is, a value you can initialize a variable to, equal to 
>> 'init', but that static analyzers know you don't mean to ever 
>> use.
>
> Don't we already have this in the form of int 
> uninitialized_value = void; ?

No it's not the same - void initialization leaves the variable 
uninitialized. I'm saying, something that still initialized, but 
marks that initial value as not to be used. Anyway... given the 
existence of void initialization (which I'd forgotten about), 
what I suggested would be very confusing to add.