The case for small diffs in Pull Requests

[Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d]

On 2016-07-19 00:30, Walter Bright wrote:
> https://medium.com/@kurtisnusbaum/large-diffs-are-hurting-your-ability-to-ship-e0b2b41e8acf#.h3eo1yvqv
>
>
> I've been advocating for a while now that PRs should be small,
> incremental, encapsulated and focused. This has not been without
> controversy. I hope the referenced article is a bit more eloquent and
> convincing than I have been.

I fully agree, the problem is if unfinished features are merged to 
master, which has happened quite a lot in D. Have you read the solution, 
linked at the bottom? [1]. As far as I can remember, I have not seen 
this used in the D projects at all.

[1] 
http://graysonkoonce.com/stacked-pull-requests-keeping-github-diffs-small/

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg