What is the current progress on "Safety and Memory Management"?

[tsbockman via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 at 13:01:23 UTC, maik klein wrote:
> I don't want to implement any memory safety at all,

If you don't care about memory safety, I expect that your efforts 
to modify Phobos for that purpose will be unwelcome. The D 
leadership are actively working on non-GC memory management, but 
safety is a high priority.

A third-party library for unsafe memory management might see some 
adoption - but it also risks being made irrelevant when and if 
the official project for safe memory management finally bears 
fruit.