The Case Against Autodecode

Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu Jun 2 14:39:15 PDT 2016


On 6/2/16 5:37 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 6/2/16 5:35 PM, deadalnix wrote:
>> On Thursday, 2 June 2016 at 21:24:15 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> On 6/2/16 5:20 PM, deadalnix wrote:
>>>> The good thing when you define works by whatever it does right now
>>>
>>> No, it works as it was designed. -- Andrei
>>
>> Nobody says it doesn't. Everybody says the design is crap.
>
> I think I like it more after this thread. -- Andrei

Meh, thinking of it again: I don't like it more, I'd still do it 
differently given a clean slate (viz. RCStr). But let's say I didn't get 
many compelling reasons to remove autodecoding from this thread. -- Andrei



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list