The Case Against Autodecode

[tsbockman via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 2 June 2016 at 22:03:01 UTC, default0 wrote:
> *sigh* reading comprehension.
> ...
> Please do not take what I say out of context, thank you.

Earlier you said:

> The level 2 support description noted that it should be opt-in 
> because its slow.

My main point is simply that you mischaracterized what the 
standard says. Making level 1 opt-in, rather than level 2, would 
be just as compliant as the reverse. The standard makes no 
suggestion as to which should be default.