The Case Against Autodecode

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d]

On 6/2/2016 3:27 PM, John Colvin wrote:
>> I wonder what rationale there is for Unicode to have two different sequences
>> of codepoints be treated as the same. It's madness.
>
> There are languages that make heavy use of diacritics, often several on a single
> "character". Hebrew is a good example. Should there be only one valid ordering
> of any given set of diacritics on any given character?

I didn't say ordering, I said there should be no such thing as "normalization" 
in Unicode, where two codepoints are considered to be identical to some other 
codepoint.